Any business marketing a product similar to, or as a substitute for, your own product in the same geographic area is a direct competitor. Indirect competitors satisfy the same customer need differently.
Competition is not just about companies that look like yours. It is about understanding every alternative your customer might choose — whether your product looks like theirs or not. If you cannot clearly identify who your competitors are and what makes your product different, you will struggle to prioritize features, position your product, or defend your roadmap.
This lesson teaches you how to think about competitors beyond surface comparisons, how to find meaningful differences, and how to use that insight to build better products.
Direct vs Indirect Competitors: The full competitive landscape
Direct competitors are companies selling similar products or services to the same customers in the same geography. For example, if you build a video streaming service in India, Hotstar and Amazon Prime Video are direct competitors.
Indirect competitors address the same customer need but with different products or services. For the video streaming example, indirect competitors include YouTube, music streaming apps, or even offline activities like reading or socializing — anything that competes for the user’s time and attention.
As Talvinder explains:
“Indirect competition will satisfy the customer’s need with a different product or service. For example, the manufacturer of eyeglasses competes indirectly with contact lens manufacturers. Both address the need for vision correction, but with different solutions.”
Recognizing indirect competitors is critical. They often represent a bigger threat than direct competitors because they compete on the same job-to-be-done but in unexpected ways.
The 80/20 rule: Focus your competitive analysis where it matters
In some markets—like steel or automobiles—you can name every competitor because there are only a few. But in most tech markets, especially in India, the competition is fragmented with hundreds of players.
Talvinder advises using the 80/20 rule:
“80% of the total market revenue is usually accounted for by 20% of the competitors. Focus your analysis on that 20%. But keep watching for new entrants who might disrupt the balance.”
For example, in personal computers, hundreds of manufacturers exist, but Compaq, IBM, and Apple dominate. Your job is to track those leaders closely.
This approach helps you save time without losing sight of the competitive dynamics that impact your product.
Beyond features: Competitive analysis through the customer’s eyes
A common mistake is to focus the competitive analysis entirely on features. Talvinder calls this the “feature war” trap. Features alone do not win customers — value delivered and positioning do.
He explains:
“Features represent how a product works. The real insight comes from contextual competitive analysis — comparing customer situations and the results your product delivers versus competitors. Features are just the icing on the cake.”
For example, two Indian HRtech platforms might both offer candidate tracking features, but one might deliver faster hiring cycles for mid-sized companies while the other targets enterprise compliance. The features overlap, but the customer value and positioning differ.
Product strategy meeting at a Series B SaaS startup in Bangalore
You (PM): “We have a feature parity with Meesho on search filters. But their users value the social shopping aspect more. We should focus on social integration to differentiate.”
Engineering Lead: “But the filters are easier to build and improve. Why not just match them?”
You (PM): “Because matching features won’t make users switch. We must solve the user’s deeper needs better than they do.”
This is where many teams get stuck — chasing features instead of outcomes.
The trap of feature parity over strategic differentiation
How to perform a competitive feature comparison
When features matter, a structured approach helps. Talvinder recommends building a feature comparison matrix:
- List key features in rows.
- Assign importance weight to each feature from the customer’s perspective.
- Create columns for your product and each competitor.
- Rate how well each product satisfies each feature.
This reveals gaps and opportunities. For example, if your product scores low on “local language support” while Meesho scores high, that gap is a clear investment area.
This matrix helps teams prioritize development and marketing focus based on objective evidence rather than guesswork.
The strategic questions every competitive analysis must answer
Competitive research is not a one-time activity. You must continuously ask:
- Who are my direct and indirect competitors right now? Who might enter my market soon?
- What are my competitors’ strengths and weaknesses? How do they position themselves?
- How do customers perceive my product compared to competitors? What jobs are we both hired to do?
- Where can I build on my strengths and minimize vulnerabilities?
- How can I diminish the value of competitors’ advantages?
- How will I communicate this competitive insight across the company — R&D, marketing, sales?
Talvinder stresses the importance of internal communication:
“Competitive information must reach every worker who needs it. R&D needs to know what gaps to fill. Marketing needs to know positioning angles. Sales needs to counter competitor claims.”
Indian market realities in competitive analysis
India’s market conditions add extra layers to competitive research:
- Fragmented user base: Different languages, income levels, and tech literacy mean competitors can dominate niches.
- Jugaad innovation: Competitors may use low-cost, unconventional solutions that don’t show up in feature lists but win customers.
- Rapid shifts: New players can quickly emerge via aggressive marketing or partnerships, changing the competitive landscape overnight.
For example, Flipkart’s rise was not just about features but aggressive pricing, supply chain innovation, and local language support.
Field Exercise: Map your competitive landscape (time=15 min)
Pick your product or a product you know well from the Indian market (Swiggy, Razorpay, Meesho, etc.). Write down:
- Direct competitors: Companies selling a similar product to the same customers.
- Indirect competitors: Different products or services that satisfy the same customer job.
- For each competitor, note their strengths and weaknesses.
- Identify one gap in your product where a competitor is stronger.
- Suggest one strategic move to address that gap or leverage your advantage.
Reflect on how this exercise changes your understanding of your product’s place in the market.
Test yourself: Competitive analysis at a Series B SaaS startup
You are a PM at a Series B SaaS startup in Mumbai providing HR management software to 200 mid-sized companies. Your main direct competitors are Zoho People and Freshworks. Indirect competitors include Excel-based HR tracking and manual processes. You have a limited engineering budget to build new features.
The call: How do you prioritize your competitive analysis and product roadmap decisions?
Your reasoning:
You are a PM at a Series B SaaS startup in Mumbai providing HR management software to 200 mid-sized companies. Your main direct competitors are Zoho People and Freshworks. Indirect competitors include Excel-based HR tracking and manual processes. You have a limited engineering budget to build new features.
Your task: How do you prioritize your competitive analysis and product roadmap decisions?
your reasoning:
From the field: Talvinder on competitive analysis in India
Where to go next
- If you want to learn how to deeply understand customers: User Research Methods
- If you want to translate competitive insights into strategy: Product Vision and Strategy
- If you want to master prioritization: Prioritization Frameworks
- If you want to prepare for PM interviews with real-world scenarios: PM Interview Practice